Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 42 (2023): Advancing Women in Leadership Journal

Career Trajectories of Women Faculty Who Became Academic Administrators

July 5, 2018


Women faculty often view academic leadership as incompatible with their work-life balance, detracting from research and teaching commitments, resulting in a loss of autonomy and an abandonment of discipline, promoting change in their relationships with colleagues, and placing an increased emphasis on budgeting, regulations and compliance (DeZure et al., 2014).  Many researchers suggest that institutional culture works against leadership development for faculty, making the transition from faculty to administrator unlikely (Barden & Curry, 2013). It is increasingly important to identify the key factors that make the difference for women faculty to assume these roles.  As such, in this study qualitative methods were employed to examine the experiences and career trajectories of 16 academic women who held tenured, fully promoted faculty positions prior to becoming administrators.  The researcher found evidence to support future recruitment and retention in higher education leadership.


  1. American Council on Education (ACE). (2017). American College President Study 2017.
  2. Retrieved from
  3. Catalyst. (2017, October 20). Quick take: Women in academia. New York: Catalyst. Retrieved
  4. from
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
  6. approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  7. Barden, D.M. & Curry, J. (2013, April 8). Faculty members can lead, but will they? Chronicle of
  8. Higher Education, Run Your Campus. Retrieved from
  9. Bothwell, E. (2018, February 8). Work-life balance survey 2018: Long hours take their toll on
  10. academics. Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Retrieved from
  11. DeZure, D., Shaw, A. & Rojeswki, J. (2014, January/February). Cultivating the next generation
  12. of academic leaders: Implications for administration and faculty. Change. Retrieved from /January-February2014/cultivating_full.html.
  13. Dominici, F., Fried, L.P., & Zeger, S.L. (2013, December 12). So few women leaders: It's no
  14. longer a pipeline problem, so what are the root causes? American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from
  15. Dunn, D., Gerlach, J.M. & Hyle, A.E. (2014). Gender and leadership: Reflections of women in
  16. higher education administration. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 2(1), 9-18.
  17. Ely, R., Ibarra, H. & Kolb, D. (2011, September 3). Taking gender into account: Theory and
  18. design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Retrieved from
  19. Flaherty, C. (2016, August 22). More faculty diversity, not on tenure track. Inside Higher Ed.
  20. Retrieved from
  21. Johnson, Heather L. (2016). Pipelines, pathways, and institutional leadership: An update on the
  22. status of women in higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from
  23. Mirsa, J., Hicks Lundquist, J., Holmes, E. & Agiomavritis, S. (2011, January-February). The
  24. ivory ceiling of service work. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from
  25. Mirsa, J., Hicks Lundquist, J. & Templer, A. (2012, May 30). Gender, work time, and care
  26. responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27 (2).
  27. Mooney, C. (2013, July 22). Leadership, work-life balance help make great colleges. Chronicle
  28. of Higher Education, Run Your Campus. Retrieved from
  29. Oguntoyinbo, L. (2014, April 27). Study: Female leaders in higher ed face different expectations
  30. than males. Diversity: Issues in Higher Education. Retrieved from
  31. Parker, P., Hewitt, B., Witheriff, J. & Cooper, A. (2018, February 27). Frank and fearless:
  32. Supporting academic career progression of women in an Australian Program.
  33. Administrative Sciences, 8(5), doi:10.3390/admnsci8010005.
  34. Reid, P.T. (2012, Spring Supplement). Black and female in academia. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from
  35. Selzer, R., Howton, A. & Wallace, F. (2017, May 31). Rethinking women's leadership
  36. development: Voices from the trenches. Administrative Sciences, 7(18), doi:10.3390/admnsci7020018.
  37. The Center for WorkLife Law, UC Hastings College of the Law. (2013). Effective policies and
  38. programs for retention and advancement of women in academia. Retrieved from
  39. Tiao, N. (2006). Senior Women Leaders in Higher Education Overcoming Barriers to Success.
  40. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eastern Michigan State University, MI.
  41. Ward, K. & Eddy, P.L. (2013, December 9). Women and academic leadership. Chronicle of
  42. Higher Education Commentary. Retrieved from http//